Click here for our Main Menu
THE SUNDAY MORNING PHOTOGRAPHER


A monthly column by Mike Johnston



June 5, 2005




"Tough" and "Sweet"

I'd like to try out an idea on you. You know, kinda throw it at the wall and see if it sticks.

If you've studied philosophy or read Nietzsche, you probably had to learn the terms "Dionysian" and "Apollonian." Those might be very useful terms, if more people could remember what the heck they meant. They describe a classic dichotomy. That's from the Greek dikhotomos, a splitting in two. Or, as the old joke puts it, "There are two kinds of people in the world. People who always divide everything up into two kinds, and people who don't." Ba-dum.

Well, for some time now I've been trying to put together a book of amateur color photography culled from web exhibits, so I've looked at internet picture sites until I'm bleary-eyed. It occurred to me a while back that I really do see a "split" of sorts operating in the photographic Universe. A real live dichotomy.

I think I have a clear understanding of the two sides of my dichotomy, and I think I can describe what I mean well enough so that you will, too. My problem has been coming up with two good words to call them. Mindful of Dionysius and Apollo, I figured I should used plain, easily-understood words. Where the problem comes in is that there really is no good side or bad side, no right or wrong. Some people tend toward one, some people tend toward the other. I know where I stand, personally, but I didn't want to slight the opposite approach, either. So I thought that I should try to come up with two terms that I could at least plausibly envision people using as compliments when talking to others of similar taste. The two words I came up with are "tough" and "sweet."

Now here's what I mean by them. Of course, being a great one for qualifying, I have to qualify this--these are not opposite camps, not mutually exclusive categories that everything has to be divided up into. They can shade into one another. Nor are any of the descriptive terms I'm using here solely descriptive of one side and not at all of the other. I'm just trying to convey what I mean, not set definitions in stone. The dichotomy is only a generalization, and the descriptive terms are only indications. 'Kay?

So here goes.

TOUGH SWEET
Real Idealized
Candid Posed
Found Set up
Vivid Pastel
Hard-hitting Gentle
Documentary Picturesque
Dark Happy
Unflinching Reticent
Tragic Optimistic
Committed Respectful
Location Studio
"Existing" light "Natural" light
Personal Public
Inventive Classic
Immediate Timeless
Chaotic Ordered
Naked Nude
Subversive Composed
Different Universal
Playful photographer Playful subject
Experimental Accepted
Ironic Earnest
Gritty Dreamy
Specific Generic
Expressive Formalized
Disturbing Reassuring


Okay. If I've done my job here as I intended, you've probably already noticed that you're leaning toward one list or the other — not because the terms on one side are positive and the other negative, but because they express diverging outlooks, one of which happens to appeal to you more. Similarly, if I've managed to describe these two divergent attitudes in relatively value-neutral terms, you could imagine either term being used as a compliment or as an insult in different contexts.

What I'd really like to do is illustrate this, of course, rather than talk about it. However, it's been difficult for me to do this because it takes so long to get permissions from people on picture sites.

So I'm asking for your help. If you have a picture or two, or many, that you wouldn't mind having published in this space in a few weeks, and that you think is or are either "tough" or "sweet" in one way or another, please e-mail me a link. Alternately, if you can think of another good pair of adjectives that fits in the lists above, let me know. My e-mail address is mcjohnston [at] mac [dot] com. (Please, don't write it anywhere on the 'net formatted as an address!)

Here's one pair of pictures that unambiguously express a tough and sweet split. I don't have permission to use these, so I'm putting them in this article under the terms of editorial "fair use," which allows limited use of published pictures for discursive and didactic purposes in non-commercial contexts. If either photographer has any objection at all to their pictures being used here, we will take them down.

Tough.© David Leeson Sweet. ©Anne Geddes



Both are pictures of little girls of about the same age. Both are by famous and successful photographers, who come at the project of photography from radically different perspectives. (The girl on the left, a victim of aerial bombing in Baghdad, reportedly survived.) This is an extreme, stark example, of course. Maybe you have more subtle, shaded examples. I'd like to see! I probably won't be able to respond to every e-mail, but I'll read them all. Oh, and don't send me link to other peoples' pictures — I'd like to know that I can use the pictures in this column without upsetting anybody. You can send pictures directly too if you think you have a good one that's not already on the web.

On photo.net, there is a discussion space following this column that people can use to respond or post pictures to.

Anyway, many thanks, and good light,



Mike's books and free downloads: www.lulu.com/bearpaw








Mike Johnston writes and publishes an old-fashioned, entertaining quarterly ink-on-paper newsletter called The 37th Frame ( www.37thframe.com). He has a B.F.A. in Photography from the Corcoran College of Art and Design in Washington, D.C., where he was a student of the late Steve Szabo and of Joe Cameron.

He was East Coast Editor of Camera & Darkroom magazine from 1988 to 1994 and Editor-in-Chief of PHOTO Techniques magazine from 1994-2000, where his editorial column "The 37th Frame" was a popular feature and where he presented, among other things, a set of three articles on "bokeh" by John Kennerdell, Oren Grad, and Harold Merklinger that were subsequently widely discussed among photographers.

His critical and technical writings have appeared in various publications and newsletters such as The Washington Review and D-Max. A number of his articles written under the pseudonym "L. T. Gray" (el Tigre) appeared in the English magazine Darkroom User.





Return to the
SMP Index






Content copyright © 1998-2005 Steve's Digicam Online, Inc.

Please read our Legal Notice and Privacy Notice


This column is the copyrighted property of Mike Johnston.

\n\n\n