

![]() PIC_2951.JPG 101.96 Kb 640 x 480 |
![]() PIC_2954.JPG 208.29 Kb 640 x 480 |
![]() PIC_2955.JPG 126.84 Kb 640 x 480 |
![]() PIC_2963.JPG 71.08 Kb 640 x 480 |
![]() PIC_2964.JPG 80.16 Kb 640 x 480 |
![]() PIC_2965.JPG 125.79 Kb 640 x 480 |
![]() PIC_2966.JPG 123.59 Kb 640 x 480 |
![]() PIC_2967.JPG 144.14 Kb 640 x 480 |
![]() PIC_2968.JPG 123.40 Kb 640 x 480 |
US visitors
|
UK visitors
|
One of the most limiting factors in its use as a still camera is the fact that it lacks
an optical viewfinder. There is more than enough room to put even a rudimentary "peep"
sight on the top somewhere. To aim and frame still images or movies requires the LCD.
This wouldn't normally be a problem except that Kodak used a reflective display instead
of a backlit one. This type of LCD requires a high amount of ambient light or else you
can't see anything being displayed on it. This plus the fact that it has no flash
(undoubtedly another power saving issue) makes it next to useless for picture taking
indoors unless it is really bright.
As for outdoor picture quality, well see the samples above. Color balance and exposure
is often way off the mark. The mc3's fixed-focus lens and CMOS imager produce a less
than detailed image that exhibits chromatic aberration all over the place. These
pictures are barely useable for email and then only if they're scaled down to 320x240
first. I wouldn't want to try to make photo-quality prints any bigger than wallet-size.
Since my job is reviewing digital still cameras I'm afraid that I have to give the Kodak
mc3 the kiss of death and say - look elsewhere. The Fujifilm
FinePix 40i costs considerably more but its still image quality is lightyears beyond
the mc3 and it has both an optical viewfinder and a standard backlit LCD display.
Steve's Conclusion
It does what they say it does; it plays MP3 songs, it captures
motion video and still images. But as the old saying goes, "do one thing and do it
well," these multi-function devices rarely do everything well. The mc3 is a great
little pocket-size MP3 song player and it works good as a webcam. It's a so-so
motion video capture device and as the sample photos above prove, it's a rather
poor excuse for a still image capture device.
Return To Our
Reviews Menu
Note: All photographs and page content
Copyright © 1998-2001 Steve's Digicam Online, Inc.
Nothing on this page may be used, distributed or
copied without the author's prior permission.